The research, as it actually stands.
Every figure on this page is counted from the research event log. Nothing here is typed by hand, and nothing is shown that the log does not support.
Current version: v1. No new research activity since 2026-09-25. No evidence has been collected. The paper says so itself, in its own section on what it does not claim.
The Conversion Problem
The paper is not a separate document that sits beside this system. It is this record's first version: 12 sections, 4,213 words, and 6 stated conditions under which it would be wrong.
- That the conversion problem is real and under-addressed
- That it is a design problem, not only a diffusion lag
- That rural environments expose it most clearly
- That the questions in section 10 are open
- That we would abandon the thesis on the stated conditions
- That the reasoning is worth arguing with
- No revenue, users or adoption
- No partnerships or institutional endorsement
- No valuation or market position
- No achieved scale of any kind
- No completed experiment
- No published evidence — none has been collected
- No claim that poverty will be eliminated
- No claim that this is the only possible architecture
- 01
Does new capability accumulate, or is it captured?
The argument assumes a loop: capability produces income, income produces capital, capital produces further capability. That loop can leak at every hop, and value can be captured by whoever holds the interface, the market access or the credit. If participants’ measured activity rises over several cycles while their retained income and assets do not, we have produced participation without accumulation — a far weaker claim than the one made here. This is the question most likely to invalidate the thesis.
- 02
If capability is reached without ownership, who owns the thing it is reached through?
Separating access from ownership lowers the capital barrier and makes ownership of the intermediating infrastructure decisive. The same structure can reduce dependency or manufacture it, and we do not yet know what determines which.
- 03
Is there a minimum viable set of conditions for conversion?
Infrastructure, skills, capital, trust, market access and a physical interface all appear necessary. Which are strictly necessary, and which can be substituted — by intelligence, by coordination, by someone else’s presence? The cost of the whole architecture depends on the answer.
- 04
Which parts of this arrive on their own?
Some of what we propose to build may be delivered anyway by falling costs, better models and public digital infrastructure. We cannot yet distinguish durable system gaps from temporary diffusion lags, and building for the second kind is wasted effort. This question is time-sensitive: it gets more answerable every year whether we work on it or not.
- 05
Can informal trust be represented without being destroyed?
Local trust is contextual, relational and partly unspoken. Every attempt to formalise something like it risks converting a living judgement into a score that behaves differently — which is arguably what credit scoring already did. If the act of representing reliably corrupts what is represented, the minimal useful representation does not exist.
- 06
Does coordination designed for fragmentation generalise?
Our claim that this travels beyond rural India is a hypothesis. It has not been tested, and we would rather label it than assert it.
OPEN FOR RESEARCH — A question and a falsification condition are both stated, so the record is open for research.
10 records, across 2 states.
A record's state is not set by anyone. It is derived from its events, and the reason it is in that state is produced by the same code that derived it.
- Kalki — an awaited restorer at the end of the age
- belief record · draft · v1 Migrated from a legacy record whose state could not be derived from evidence. A human must set the starting position.
- al-Mahdi — an awaited guided figure
- belief record · draft · v1 Migrated from a legacy record whose state could not be derived from evidence. A human must set the starting position.
- The Second Coming — an awaited return
- belief record · draft · v1 Migrated from a legacy record whose state could not be derived from evidence. A human must set the starting position.
- Human–machine interfaces
- frontier case · draft · v1 A question is stated but no falsification condition is written, so the record stays in draft.
- Humanoid robots in farming
- frontier case · draft · v1 A question is stated but no falsification condition is written, so the record stays in draft.
- Multiplanetary humanity
- frontier case · draft · v1 A question is stated but no falsification condition is written, so the record stays in draft.
- The Conversion Problem
- question · open for research · v1 A question and a falsification condition are both stated, so the record is open for research.
- Marriage
- assumption test · open for research · v1 A question and a falsification condition are both stated, so the record is open for research. What would change our mind: If discovery turns out to carry most of the cost and failure in the process, the assumption holds and our architecture is wrong.
- Settlement and risk
- assumption test · open for research · v1 A question and a falsification condition are both stated, so the record is open for research. What would change our mind: If damage tracks event magnitude and shows no systematic relationship to settlement architecture, the assumption holds and ours is wrong.
- Capability & responsibility
- assumption test · open for research · v1 A question and a falsification condition are both stated, so the record is open for research. What would change our mind: If, across comparable capability jumps, harm tracks raw capability with no systematic relationship to whether responsibility mechanisms were present, the hypothesis is a moral preference rather than a property of systems.
13 gaps, of 2 kinds.
- evidence gap
- 10 records. No verified evidence has been identified for or against this record.
- untested assumption
- 3 records. A falsification condition is written but no experiment has been designed to meet it.
23 events, most recent first.
- 2026-09-25 · question defined
- f-brain-interfaces · by founder
The question was already written in the legacy record. No falsification condition was recorded. - 2026-09-25 · migrated from legacy
- f-brain-interfaces · by system
Imported from data/frontier.mjs. The legacy status was "Draft" — a hand-typed string with no evidence records behind it, so it does not set the state here. - 2026-09-25 · question defined
- f-humanoid-farming · by founder
The question was already written in the legacy record. No falsification condition was recorded. - 2026-09-25 · migrated from legacy
- f-humanoid-farming · by system
Imported from data/frontier.mjs. The legacy status was "Under investigation" — a hand-typed string with no evidence records behind it, so it does not set the state here. - 2026-09-25 · question defined
- f-multiplanetary · by founder
The question was already written in the legacy record. No falsification condition was recorded. - 2026-09-25 · migrated from legacy
- f-multiplanetary · by system
Imported from data/frontier.mjs. The legacy status was "Under investigation" — a hand-typed string with no evidence records behind it, so it does not set the state here. - 2026-09-25 · migration review required
- b-second-coming · by system
The legacy status "Interpretations Differ" asserts a position on evidence, but no evidence records exist for this record. A researcher must either attach the evidence or accept the lower derived state. - 2026-09-25 · question defined
- b-second-coming · by founder
The question was already written in the legacy record. No falsification condition was recorded. - 2026-09-25 · migrated from legacy
- b-second-coming · by system
Imported from data/assumptions.mjs. The legacy status was "Interpretations Differ" — a hand-typed string with no evidence records behind it, so it does not set the state here. - 2026-09-25 · migration review required
- b-mahdi · by system
The legacy status "Interpretations Differ" asserts a position on evidence, but no evidence records exist for this record. A researcher must either attach the evidence or accept the lower derived state. - 2026-09-25 · question defined
- b-mahdi · by founder
The question was already written in the legacy record. No falsification condition was recorded. - 2026-09-25 · migrated from legacy
- b-mahdi · by system
Imported from data/assumptions.mjs. The legacy status was "Interpretations Differ" — a hand-typed string with no evidence records behind it, so it does not set the state here.
Showing the most recent 12 of 23. Every entry is an event in research/events/.
Nothing is generated to make this list longer.